Does 3D Printing Offer an Environmentally Friendly Future?

Standardization created the tremendous efficiency gains that allowed the industrial revolution to happen. But now the pendulum is swinging the other way - customization is on the rise. How can we offer custom products in a sustainable way?

By Ellen Brilhuis-Meijer on February 25, 2014

When Henry Ford implemented the conveyer belt in his car factories, allowing the T-Ford to be produced quickly and on a large scale, cars became affordable for the middle class. To make this mass production possible, the car’s design had to be highly standardized, which led to the famous quote “Any customer can have a car painted any colour that he wants so long as it is black.” Standardization was a prerequisite for the industrial revolution. The times of craftsmanship, when a product was handmade by a single person, faded away.


Now, many years after the industrial revolution, standardization is the norm almost everywhere. In response, people are feeling the need to differentiate themselves. Consumers increasingly value craftsmanship, and personalized products are becoming a new trend. Coca-Cola bottles with names on them and customizable Adidas sneakers are just the tip of the mass-customization iceberg.


3D printing meets the need for personalization perfectly, since it allows you to make whatever you want, whenever you want it. It’s the production technique of the future, allowing almost unlimited freedom. Additionally, 3D printing might be a low-impact, sustainable solution – there is no visible waste and no need for transport, warehouses, malls and packaging of anything but the raw material. So is 3D printing really the environmentally friendly production method we’ve all been waiting for?


How Sustainable Is It Really? Running the Numbers

To answer this question, we need look at the entire life cycle of both 3D-printed products and products created by traditional production techniques such as CNC milling and injection moulding. A Life Cycle Assessment undertaken by sustainability researcher Jeremy Faludi shows that the situation is not as black and white as one might hope. Certain types of 3D printers actually waste a lot of material. For example, inkjet 3D printers waste up to 45 percent of their polymeric ink. This was a big eye opener for me.


3D printing turns out to be a great example for the way we need to consider any new solution that’s introduced as the hottest new sustainable thing. 3D printing can be a solution to sustainability problems with traditional manufacturing, but we shouldn't overlook the highly efficient technology developed during the Industrial Revolution. Therefore, we have to look at the total environmental cost and benefit before we are able to judge its impacts.


As sustainability experts, we need to remain wary. We need real, hard data on any new production method or sustainable solution, so we can use well-known and reliable methods to determine and compare its total environmental impacts.

Contact the author

Ellen Brilhuis-Meijer worked at PRé as a Technical Consultant from 2012 to 2015. As a member of the Consultancy Team, she did excellent work providing SimaPro and LCA trainings and applied her skills in communicating LCA results for different business audiences.

Contact Ellen Brilhuis-Meijer
Related articles
Jun 24-25 | SimaPro and LCA: Essentials
Jun 24-26 | SimaPro and LCA: In-Depth
Jul 8-9 | SimaPro and LCA: Essentials
Jul 8-10 | SimaPro and LCA: In-Depth
Sep 16-17 | SimaPro and LCA: Essentials
Sep 16-18 | SimaPro and LCA: In-Depth
We care about your privacy. Please read how your data is collected and processed in our Privacy Statement.
Eric Mieras
Eric Mieras
Managing Director
'Positive impact makes you meaningful'